Showing posts with label ITV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ITV. Show all posts

Monday, 26 November 2012

Monday Moan 25

Christmas noise
It’s started – Christmas noise is all around us.  I am no Scrooge or Grumpy Old Man (honestly) but my patience and good nature are being sorely tested at the moment.
 
Can’t a person step out to do some shopping without their eyes and ears being assaulted by flashing lights and deafening noise from a PA system?  Twice last week I ventured out to local shopping areas.  On a late afternoon,  I chanced upon the build-up to the switching on of the festive lights.  Every child within a radius of 10 miles appeared to be there, mostly in their buggies, which made walking around for the rest of us such a pleasure, and almost without exception crying or shouting or making some other noise at high volume.  Within a few minutes of finding the relative tranquillity of a shop I then heard loud music from a PA system outside.  At least, I assumed it was just outside since it was so loud, but when I left the shop there was nothing to be seen, apart from a phalanx of buggies rushing along the road obviously on a mission to get somewhere important.  Swept along by the tide, I turned the corner to see a makeshift stage on which a young lady, apparently from a local radio station, was addressing the crowd in what can only be described as Radio DJ Estuary English, babbling along about nothing in particular and desperate for some interaction with the massed force of buggies assembled in front of her. 
 
What with that and the fairground rides and light-sabre sellers and tacky merchandise on hastily erected stalls and I was soon beating a retreat, saving my cash for another day.
 
I thought that other day might be last Saturday.  This time, partly because of the atrocious weather, the venue was a shopping centre.  It was crowded, but then it was raining and shopping centres are where people go in such circumstances.  It was noisy, but then that’s the nature of indoor shopping centres. It was full of what seemed suspiciously like the same buggies as I had encountered a couple of days earlier, but there was more room for manoeuvring round them so things didn’t seems so bad. There was a band of carol singers at one end of the mall, so I moved away fairly quickly. But once down the other end the loud music started and then I spotted another makeshift stage.  Surely lightning couldn’t strike twice?  Oh yes it could! Admittedly it was a different young lady and a different local radio station, but the approach and effect were the same – too much noise, too little enjoyment, and I was out of there as quickly as I could.
 
I still have money to spend at Christmas, but I think I will do most of my shopping online in the peace and quiet of my own home.
  
 
What’s the point, and what’s the cost?
The EU summit last week to discuss the budget for 2014-2020 was as predictable as it was disheartening.  Get the EU’s 27 leaders together to agree a budget?  More chance of winning the lottery than that they will agree anything at the first such meeting.  It’s all a rather weary charade isn’t it?  We all know what the respective positions of the member countries are and we all know they will not be able to agree. But we still have to go through the nonsense of these important people drawing up outside the building in their limousines, getting out, walking over to state their prepared positions to the waiting press, and then disappearing inside for the summit.  Two days later they will all emerge to give press conferences to say they are determined to stick to their positions, that the others are inflexible, that the European Commission has not worked hard enough to come up with an acceptable package, and then they will all disperse to their respective countries to play out the next round of the charade for their domestic audiences. 
 
They will be back.  And so will the circus that surrounds such events, including hordes of journalists and camera teams from every broadcaster in the EU, eager to catch the utterances of these god-like leaders and then play them back to us during the evening news bulletins as if there was something happening that was really newsworthy.
 
I’m fed-up with it all.  And I want to know how much all this costs – not just the costs of the summits themselves, but the preparations beforehand, the travelling and accommodation. And I want to know the cost involved in the assembling of the world’s press at such events.  How much do the BBC, ITV and Sky spend on sending their own teams to relay back to us the news that there is no news, only what we all knew already?
 
Someone ought to call a halt to it all.  Make a stand. Save some money. Demand that we all stop pretending that the meetings are anything more than a charade along the way towards eventual agreement.
 
 
Spot the difference
Now that I am a man of leisure I get time to look at things in more detail.  Some might say this results in me finding things to moan about that really aren’t worth getting bothered about.  They may be right, but isn’t that the attitude that allows people to get away with things that ought not to be allowed? 
 
For example, now that I shop more than I used to I have noticed how confusing everything is when you are trying to assess the value of what you buy.  Picking just one thing at random, I decided to buy some biscuits for Christmas last week – buy early and then avoid the hassle later, I thought.  I spotted a box of Crawford’s biscuits that appeared to be the same as the one I bought last year – yes, that would be an easy option, so into the basket it went.
 
But when I got home and put it side by side with last year’s, all seemed slightly different.  Instead of 12 varieties of biscuits we now had only 10.  It took some forensic examination to discover that the ‘missing’ biscuits included jammy dodgers – how could they!  Further close examination revealed that the weight of biscuits included in the box was actually more this year than last.  Curious. My initial instinct was that since the price was unchanged from last year this must mean the box was better value this time.  Fortunately, my wife was on hand to add the appropriate note of caution, suggesting that removing the jammy dodgers and one other ‘exotic’ biscuit meant that the weight gain could only have been achieved by increasing the proportion of plain, boring biscuits, so the overall value was diminished.
 
Far too complicated for me – just what the manufacturer’s intended, no doubt.
 
 
Didn’t he used to be good?
Watching Match of the Day last night we had the now familiar discussion after any match involving Chelsea of what was wrong with Fernando Torres and when was he going to rediscover his form.
 
The experts flap around looking for reasons why Torres no longer looks like he knows how to score goals. They remember him as he used to be and wonder who or what can spark him back to life.  It’s all very repetitive and pointless.
 
My wife interjected – “why are they bothering with this, he was rubbish at Liverpool and he’s rubbish at Chelsea”.  She was right, of course.  Although I should add that he was only rubbish at Liverpool after his two knee operations in 2010.  Might be a bit of a clue there, perhaps? Prior to that he had been a real goalscorer, but he never recovered this form.
 
Liverpool made one of the most astute transfer deals in recent years when they sold this crocked Torres to cash-rich Chelsea in January 2011 for £50m.  Laughing all the way to the bank?  Not quite, because the gloss of this clever deal was almost rubbed out by their decision to blow £35m of it on Andy Carroll – so Newcastle were actually the astute dealers in this little exchange.
 
Anyway, the point is that Torres might one day discover the form that once made him a great striker, but don’t bet too much of your money on it – the English game is full of ex-Liverpool strikers who lost their touch but were still purchased by a succession of clubs dazzled by their former prowess – think Robbie Fowler and Michael Owen, for example.
 

 

Monday, 5 November 2012

Monday Moan 22

Too much for the mornings
Can’t get out of the habit of listening to the Today programme in the mornings, but it’s beginning to challenge my concentration and interest levels at that time of the day, now that I don’t actually need to be up that early.

To add to the frustrations of the irritating presenters (see Moan 8) we also have to contend with so many either simply uninteresting or impenetrable pieces.  When an item hits both of those buttons then I find myself stretching for the ‘off’ switch.

Last Friday we had the joy of listening to a ‘debate’ on the topic of ‘what does the City of London have to fear from Europe?’  On one side we had Sharon Bowles, MEP for South East England and Chair of the European Parliament's Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee.  On the other we had Bob Lyddon, a management consultant specialising in European Banking and author of the Bruges Group report  ‘The UK’s risks and exposure to the European Investment Bank and other financial European mechanisms’ – my heart was not fluttering with excitement.
When Sharon Bowles started talking about CRD4 and OTC Derivatives I had a sinking feeling in my stomach. Justin Webb, the presenter, had the good sense to ask her to explain what they were, but Bob Lyddon failed to take the hint when answering a question about what, specifically, he thought the City needed to be concerned about, when he said “Basle 3, which is what we call CRD4, given that Basle 1 and Basle 2 caused the financial crisis…”

He was asked again “What are the Europeans going to do that the City should be worried about?” to which he responded with something about the Financial Transactions tax. Sharon Bowles jumped in to say “it’s not going to be introduced in a way that the UK is having to introduce it” – thanks for that clarification Sharon, but how would the EU stop it? “they have to make sure it doesn’t distort the single market and if it does then they can stop it and indeed if it does then so can those that are not going to join it.” Ah, I see.
Sharon was not one to hide her achievements either – “On OTC Derivatives it was me that blazed a trail in Europe to exempt foreign exchange, it was me that blazed a trail to exempt corporate end users and pension funds, it was me where I stopped retroactive clearing requirements.”  Well, thank goodness for Sharon is all I can say.

Justin Webb then gave Bob Lyddon a chance to get a word in and said “so, you can do it [stop EU regulation] and it would have been worse if we had been left on our own?”  To which the rather lame response from Bob was “well I don’t know, two lots of medicine, one is supposedly worse than the other, we’d prefer to have no medicine”
Time to hit the snooze button.


 
That's a bit of luck
Not sure if it’s a good thing to realise that all those celebrities who you used to think of as weird and slightly odd are now seemingly caught up in the Jimmy Savile scandal. Apart from the late Jimmy Savile himself, I am thinking here of Gary Glitter and now Freddie Starr.

There was something rather uncomfortable about listening to Freddie Starr being interviewed on TV  last week expressing his distaste for the despicable things Jimmy Savile has been alleged to have been doing – not that Freddie knew about them, of course. 
I couldn’t quite put my finger on it (perhaps not the best choice of words in relation to this story), but wasn’t it lucky for Freddie that schools were closed last week for half term, thus allowing his newest fiancĂ© to be sat there at his side whilst he was being interviewed?

 

It must be important because the News teams are there
You can always tell when a news story is important because the News channels ship their anchor men and women over to wherever it might be in the world, so that they can report ‘live’ from the scene.  Superstorm Sandy merited the ITV news team going over and they are still there now to report on the American Presidential election.  No doubt the BBC team is on its way even now.

Does it add to our understanding or enjoyment?  Why can’t they just trust it to their relevant correspondents already stationed out there?  How do they feel about having to answer the questions posed by the incoming UK-based people rather than themselves being seen as the top person doing the interviewing?

  


Downton Abbey – life is quite simple really
Downton Abbey may be over for another season (although it is coming back for a Christmas Special, apparently) but I am still not supposed to say anything comical or questioning or disparaging about it (see Moan 16).

So, working within those guidelines, I think I can say that yesterday’s final episode managed to gallop through a huge number of issues with barely a pause either for breath or to apologise for the many significant changes in the way the characters were 'developed'.

And at the end, the key message appeared to be that the world would be a better place if everyone would just take up cricket. Even if the English themselves were not very good at it.