Special
Paralympic Edition
Paralympics – is it
News?
Channel
4’s coverage of the Paralympics has drawn even more complaints than did the BBC’s
of the main Olympics. Of course, it’s
easy to pick on small things and perhaps blow them out of proportion, but as I have
said previously, it’s attention to detail that matters!
So, we start with their ponderous coverage of
the Opening Ceremony. Like the BBC,
Channel 4 decided that this should be fronted by a newsman rather than a sports
journalist. I can understand that. But was Jon Snow really the best choice
available? Presumably because he didn’t
know much about sport he decided that he would introduce each of the
participating nations by referring to whether or not they were in the process
of a civil war or had suffered similar problems in recent years. Interesting in almost any other context, but
not for the Paralympics, surely?
I saw Jon Snow on the Breakfast show on Channel 4 the morning
after the Opening Ceremony. He talked
about how he had been affected by the build-up to the Games. He said he was a hardened hack, a cynic, a
sceptic, who usually demanded “bring me the bad news”. But he said that “this period has seen the
media behave in a completely un-media way, so the question is will we behave
better, will we behave cleaner, will we behave and perhaps reflect the goodness
of humanity a little more?”
Er, no, I don’t think so.
Paralympics – got
something to sell?
Those of us used to watching our sport on the
BBC (OK, not so much of it these days, now that Sky has bought the rights to
just about everything) had been grateful that their Olympic coverage was
uninterrupted by the commercial breaks that are a fact of life on every other
channel.
No such luck with the Paralympics,
unfortunately. It’s not that they take their breaks at particularly unfortunate
times, although that has happened on occasions, including during the Opening
Ceremony, but it’s also that cutting away to adverts destroys the continuity
and the atmosphere.
Paralympics –
things that Channel 4 should not have copied from the BBC
OK, asking Clare Balding to front the main
evening programme after her starring role for the BBC was a smart move. Sitting her alongside Ade Adepitan was more
questionable from a number of angles – they do not have the same rapport as
Clare had with Mark Foster during the BBC’s coverage, and where they were seen
to be facing each other and having a conversation, she and Ade are facing the
camera and one of them, at least, is reading a script.
I am not vain enough to imagine that my
criticisms of aspects of the BBC’s coverage would have been noticed by anybody,
but I was not alone in many of my views.
It’s a shame, therefore, that Channel 4 appears to have been copying the
BBC’s approach, presumably because it is so lacking in experience of covering
such events and so thought it best to follow the leader. For example;-
I criticised the BBC in MOAN 10 for its insistence
on screening pre-recorded pieces to introduce events and getting the timing
wrong so that we missed some of the important build up. Unfortunately, Channel 4 has been doing
exactly the same thing. Channel 4 has
also failed to prefect the art of subtefuge.
Trying to cover up the fact that it has not got to the live action in
time following its pre-recorded pieces, it has been editing the stadium introductions
to the athletes before races to pretend that they are live. Unfortunately, Channel 4 has failed to realise
that live crowds make noise and get animated, so cutting from pictures and
sounds of a frenzied reception for an athlete to the actual live shots right at
the start of the race doesn’t fool anybody, since the crowd by that time is
quiet and still;
I criticised the BBC for constantly plugging
its own shows (MOAN 10) – unfortunately Channel 4 is doing the same
thing. As a result I am taking a
principled stand and will be refusing to watch ‘Shameless’ or use Channel 4 OD,
since both have been so heavily plugged; and
I criticised the BBC for its post-race
interviewing techniques (MOAN 10 and MOAN 11) – whilst, mercifully, Channel 4 has not so
far come up with anybody like Phil Jones, the questions being fired
at competitors at the end of each race or event are so banal and pointless they
almost make me wish for the adverts to cut in!
The BBC has been in a difficult position,
given that it is not actually broadcasting the Paralympics. So we have seen that on most days the BBC
News has taken the Paralympics as the main news item – partly because until now
our politicians have been on holiday and so we don’t have to be subjected to
their often meaningless statements (all about to change now that they are
drifting back to work).
But in the spirit of fun that the Paralympics
has generated, the BBC provided a highlight on Sunday’s main news programme by
relegating Australia from the top 3 of the medal table and installing
Afghanistan instead. Those who hadn’t
been following the medal table may have wondered how such a war-torn and
desperately poor country had managed to find such excellence in its
Paralympians – but the truth was that they hadn’t, of course. It was nice while it lasted though. There is a part of me that just can’t help
wondering if it was a wind-up designed to rub salt into Australian wounds?
I
was lucky enough to be able to go to the athletics on Saturday night. It was an unforgettable occasion and all that
has been said about the enthusiasm and friendliness of the crowds was true as
far as I could see.
Of
course, it was disappointing that there were no GB victories to celebrate on
Saturday. No chance to bellow out the
national anthem. But that didn’t stop
the mass waving of Union Jacks, even if it did seem somehow strange that the
loudest roars and the wildest flag-waving were for victories by two Irishmen
and a South African. I’m sure the same would
have happened in reverse had the games been held in Dublin or Cape Town. Maybe the crowd were confused by the Irish
colours being worn by men from Belfast and Derry?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcomed - although I reserve the right to behave grumpily when I read them